However, this part of the result was banned by Congress and the US selling price was only abolished when Congress adopted the results of the Tokyo Round. Performance across agriculture has been poor. The most notable success was the agreement on a memorandum of understanding on fundamental elements for the negotiation of a global subsidy arrangement, which was eventually included in a new international agreement on cereals. Following the UK`s vote to leave the EU, supporters of leaving the EU have proposed that Article 24(5B) of the treaty could be used to maintain a “halt” in trade conditions between the UK and the EU if the UK leaves the EU without a trade deal, thus preventing the introduction of tariffs. According to proponents of this approach, it could be used to implement an interim agreement until a final agreement of up to ten years is negotiated.  For the most part, agriculture was exempted from previous agreements, as it obtained special status in the import quota and export subsidy sectors, with slight reservations. However, at the time of the Uruguay Round, many countries felt that the exception for agriculture was so blatant that they refused to sign a new agreement without agricultural products without movement. These fourteen countries were known as the “Cairns Group” and consisted mainly of small and medium-medium-largest agricultural exporters such as Australia, Brazil, Canada, Indonesia and New Zealand. The Uruguay Round began in 1986. This was the most ambitious round to date, starting in 1986, in which GATT competences were to be extended to important new areas such as services, capital, intellectual property, textiles and agriculture. 123 countries participated in the round.
The Uruguay Round was also the first round of multilateral trade negotiations in which developing countries played an active role.  The assertion that Article 24 could be used in this way has been criticized as unrealistic by Mark Carney, Liam Fox and others, given that there must be agreement between the parties to paragraph 5c of the Treaty for paragraph 5b to be useful, given that there would be no agreement in the event of a no-deal scenario. In addition, critics of the GATT 24 approach point out that services would not be covered by such regulation.   Tariff reduction and new rules to control the spread of non-tariff barriers and voluntary export restrictions. 102 countries participated in the round. Trade concessions worth $19 billion have been made. The sixth round of GATT multilateral trade negotiations, which ran from 1964 to 1967. It is named after U.S. President John F.
Kennedy in recognition of his support for the reformulation of the U.S. trade agenda, which led to the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. This law gave the president the broadest bargaining power ever. Ang layunin ng GA TT ay suportahan ang internasyonal na kala kalan sa pamamagitan ng pag bawas o pag elimina ng mga had lang gaya ng tariffs o quotas. Gatt and its successor, the WTO, have succeeded in reducing tariffs. Average tariffs for the main GATT participants were about 22% in 1947 and 5% after the Uruguay Round in 1999.  Experts attribute some of these customs changes to GATT and the WTO.    While the GATT was a set of rules agreed upon by nations, the WTO is an intergovernmental organization with its own headquarters and staff, and its scope encompasses trade in goods, trade in services and intellectual property rights.
Although intended to serve as multilateral agreements, plurilateral agreements have resulted in selective trade and fragmentation of members in several rounds of GATT negotiations (notably Tokyo). WTO agreements are generally a multilateral GATT resolution mechanism.  In addition to facilitating applied tariff reductions, the contribution of the FIRST GATT to trade liberalization includes “the commitment of negotiated tariff reductions for an extended period (made more permanent in 1955), the identification of the general benefit of most-favoured-nation non-discrimination (CNPF treatment) and the status of domestic treatment, the guarantee of greater transparency of trade policies and the establishment of a orum for the future Negotiations and for the peaceful settlement of bilateral disputes. . . .