An ancillary contract, if concluded between the same parties as the main contract, cannot contradict the main contract. In other words, if the clause was agreed before the conclusion of the formal contract (but was still included as a clause and could not be executed before the conclusion of the second term), the first term is still allowed.  In essence, security agreements must not contradict any element of the main contract or the rights it created.  One theory is that it is possible to characterize a letter of credit as a guarantee agreement for a third party beneficiary, since letters of credit are motivated by the buyer`s need and, in application of Jean Domat`s theory, the cause of a letter of credit is that a bank issues a loan in favor of a seller in order to release the buyer from his obligation, to be paid directly to the legal tender seller. In fact, there are three different entities that participate in the letter of credit transaction: the seller, the buyer, and the banker. If the materials turn out to be defective, X Z may be able to sue Z even if they don`t have a contract with the other. The common law recognizes the warranty contract as an exception to Parol`s rule of proof, which means that the admissible evidence for a warranty contract can be used to exclude the application of Parol`s rule of proof. In practice, it is rare to find a collateral contract as an exception, as it must be strictly proven; and the burden of proof is lightened only if the subject matter dealt with in the main contract is more unusual.  A security agreement is generally a fixed-term contract concluded against the party for who benefit the contract works and agrees to enter into the main or main contract containing additional terms for the same subject matter as the main contract.  For example, a security agreement is entered into when one party pays the other party a certain amount to enter into another contract.
. . .